User:ConstanceWarner498 reinle

The publisher's justification for a brand new "edition" is that [www.MyParallelBible.com Chant D'Esperance] was initial published in 1909 added material and published another edition in 1917. however it is an author's preogative to change his own works, however that definitely doesn't give others, over 45 years once his death, a blank check to create alterations and then sign his name to it!

If we altered the ending of "Macbeth" we'd be but honest to claim that the modification met Shakespeare's approval.

Secondly, the editors exercised nice liberty in changing attributes of Dr. Scofield's reference work that Dr. Scofield himself felt vital enough to include in his work. within the introduction to their doubly dishonest 1967 publication they admit such changes.

New Scofield: "Among the changes and enhancements in this edition are: important word changes in the text to assist the reader; a changed system of self-pronunciation; revision of the many of the introductions to the books of the Bible, as well as designation of the author, theme, and date; additional subheadings; clarification of some footnotes, deletion of others, and the addition of many new notes;: more marginal references; an entirely new chronology; a brand new index; a concordance particularly prepared for this edition; new maps; and additional legible kind. a number of these features are explained below."

By their own words, they admit to altering Dr. Scofield's text (the King James Bible), introduction of books of the Bible, notes, marginal references, chronology and lots of different features.

[www.MyParallelBible.com Spanish English bilingual bible] give his approval to these changes? Not unless one amongst the nine committee members had the witch of Endor conjure him up as she had Samuel!

In fact, the publisher even admits that the changes created were arbitrary decisions of the revision committee.

"Each position taken represents the thinking or conviction of the committee as a bunch."

What are the results of such shenanigans? One example can suffice. let us examine the footnote found in Acts 8:12 of the [www.MyParallelBible.com Haitian Creole Bible] regarding baptism.

"Baptism has, since the apostolic age, been practiced by each major cluster in the Christian church and, in Protestant communions, is recognized together of 2 sacraments - the other being the Lord's Supper. Since early within the Church's history three totally different modes of baptism have been used: aspersion (sprinkling); affusion (pouring); and immersion (dipping)."

Here we tend to see that the 9 revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) believe that there's a difference between the true Christian church and Protestant "communion". might I ask? When one cluster is outlined as "Protestant" what is the opposite cluster called?

Secondly, the 9 apostate revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) claim, without scriptural proof that Christians baptize by pouring and sprinkling as well as immersion.

Remember, the footnote is found during a S-C-O-F-I-E-L-D of 1967. A book that claims on its title page that a dead man (Dr. Scofield) is one in every of its editors.

What does the footnote for Acts 8:12 in the REAL [www.MyParallelBible.com Scofield bible] of 1917 which had a living Dr. Scofield as its editor say?

Nothing. there is no such footnote!

That's right! The New Haitian Creole Bible never approved of and never had during a text anytime in his life time!

I ask you, is this honest?

Proof that the large print [www.MyParallelBible.com french english Parallel bible] is found on nearly every page where the margin notes the twin Bible reading as "KJV". The text of the New Scofield Bible isn't a King James Bible and it is NOT a Scofield Bible.

It might be noted that in recent years the scale and form of the New Scofield Bible has been changed to additional resemble the Scofield Reference Bible. many Christians who desire a true Scofield Reference Bible have purchased a replacement Scofield Bible by mistake.